| December 18, 2018 | (4) Posted in Tips

If you’re new to the hobby, you may be unfamiliar with this term - so here's what it means:
Wing loading is the total weight of an airplane divided by the area of its wings. As you might imagine, wing loading is therefore important for determining an airplane’s flying characteristics. We’ll go into this in a moment.

In detail

One easy way to think about wing loading is to imagine the relationship between lift and weight as a balancing act; the faster an aircraft flies, the more lift the wings create. This means that faster aircraft can get away with having higher wing loadings than slower aircraft.

An F-104 Starfighter flies extremely fast and can, therefore, have very small wings.

The wing loading of a human with two wings strapped to their arms is far too great to sustain flight. If the human weighed less, perhaps if they were on a planet with less gravity but the same atmosphere as Earth, they might have a 'less-than-critical' wing loading that would be capable of flight.

Effect on stall speeds and stability

It is very helpful to know your approximate wing loading when predicting stall speeds. Aircraft with large wing areas relative to their weight (low wing loading) will have lower stalling speeds. RC trainers are good examples of planes with beginner-friendly stall speeds thanks, in part, to their low wing loadings.

The caveat to planes with large wing surfaces and low weights being generally easier to handle is that they aren’t usually as good in the wind. A small wing has less area on which the wind can push whereas a larger wing has more. Most foam board planes can be built with low wing loadings meaning they only stall at very low airspeeds - which is nice!

So how do you work out the wing loading of a particular model aircraft? Well, to start with, you’ll need to know the wing area and the weight of the model (ready to fly with a battery or fuel). Here’s an example:

Example model wing area = 600 in2

Example model AUW = 5.5 lbs

Okay, now we have our data, we’ll want to convert each to the standard units used for measuring wing loading which is oz./ft2.

1. Converting the area. There are 144 (12 x 12) square inches in a square foot so:

600 in2 ÷ 144 = 4.17 ft2

1. Converting the weight. There are 16 ounces in a pound so:

5.5 lbs x 16 = 88 oz.

1. Now all that’s left is to do the division of the weight and area:

88 oz. ÷ 4.17 ft2 = 21.1 oz./ft2

Hopefully that wasn’t too confusing.

So how do we put this information about wing loading into practice? Well, as Josh Bixler says, you have to start by thinking about the experience you want. Perhaps you want a plane that flies fast and can be flown in the wing - for this, you’ll probably want smaller wings whilst your all up weight (AUW) remains relatively high. This plane (below) is small and relatively heavy. This means it has to be flown fairly fast.

If you’re going for more of a trainer that has forgiving stall characteristics and can be flown very slowly, large wings and a low AUW would be preferable. This aircraft (below) is very lightweight and has a lot of lift from undercambered wings.

Make sure you've listened to this podcast with Josh Bixler which explains how he goes about designing planes with aerodynamics in mind.

This plane (below) may look like it shouldn't fly slowly, what with its stubby wings, but it is extremely lightweight meaning that the wing loading still quite low.

Article by James Whomsley

Editor of FliteTest.com

Contact: james@flitetest.com

thenated0g on December 19, 2018
Personally i find cubic wing loading to be much more usefull as it tells you what your plane will fly like. You can have two planes with the same wing loading that fly totally different if at all but cubic wing loading tells you if it will fly like a glider or an edf jet.